<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bombproof Project: Geared vs. Singlespeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/</link>
	<description>Mountain Bike Reviews, News, Deals and How Tos</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yahoouj</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-203091</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoouj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-203091</guid>
		<description>Really good work about this website was done. Keep trying more - thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good work about this website was done. Keep trying more - thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-102827</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-102827</guid>
		<description>There's no shifter post yet, so I'm asking here: is it utterly insane that I think Paul Thumbies, combined with middle-of-the-line bar-end shifters, might be the right choice?  They're expensive, no doubt, but simple, user-serviceable and durable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no shifter post yet, so I&#8217;m asking here: is it utterly insane that I think Paul Thumbies, combined with middle-of-the-line bar-end shifters, might be the right choice?  They&#8217;re expensive, no doubt, but simple, user-serviceable and durable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-84950</link>
		<dc:creator>Dietrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-84950</guid>
		<description>The achilles heel of a multispeed bike is the rear derailler hanger.  Shimano's Hone axle mounted derailler eliminates this weak spot and preserves derailler alignment through most any impact.  

Swap a 187mm threaded tandem axle into any Shimano hub, put a track nut on the left side, and you're set.  After enduring years of bent hangers I made the conversion - it's bombproof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The achilles heel of a multispeed bike is the rear derailler hanger.  Shimano&#8217;s Hone axle mounted derailler eliminates this weak spot and preserves derailler alignment through most any impact.  </p>
<p>Swap a 187mm threaded tandem axle into any Shimano hub, put a track nut on the left side, and you&#8217;re set.  After enduring years of bent hangers I made the conversion - it&#8217;s bombproof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIchael</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-83759</link>
		<dc:creator>MIchael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-83759</guid>
		<description>Why not an internal hub?

SRAM makes a nice one. 7 speeds and all... and since it's obvious weight isn't a concern by the frame you've chosen, the weight penalty doesn't matter one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not an internal hub?</p>
<p>SRAM makes a nice one. 7 speeds and all&#8230; and since it&#8217;s obvious weight isn&#8217;t a concern by the frame you&#8217;ve chosen, the weight penalty doesn&#8217;t matter one bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slippery Pete</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-83006</link>
		<dc:creator>Slippery Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-83006</guid>
		<description>If the reason for going geared vs. singlespeed is that more beginners and weekend warriors would probably start out geared, then shouldn't the bomb proof bike also be built with a suspension fork, rather than rigid.

Most beginners and weekend warriors would probably be starting out on a hardtail. Rigid, like singlespeed, seems to be something people progress to. It would also be interesting to see which affordable, yet bombproof trail fork makes the cut.

I know, I know. I should just start my own project rather than pick at someone else's. Great web site by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the reason for going geared vs. singlespeed is that more beginners and weekend warriors would probably start out geared, then shouldn&#8217;t the bomb proof bike also be built with a suspension fork, rather than rigid.</p>
<p>Most beginners and weekend warriors would probably be starting out on a hardtail. Rigid, like singlespeed, seems to be something people progress to. It would also be interesting to see which affordable, yet bombproof trail fork makes the cut.</p>
<p>I know, I know. I should just start my own project rather than pick at someone else&#8217;s. Great web site by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Grahl</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-82869</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Grahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-82869</guid>
		<description>Grant:  I've busted a derailleur before and can attest that they can be damage relatively easily by  catching it on a rock or falling the right way.

But as Fritz and James mentioned and I discussed some in the post, the rear derailleur is just more practical for the beginner rider.

I've seen more and more discussion and prototypes of the internal gear system and know it's being used on some commuter bikes already to save the mess of chains and grease, however as far as I know, there currently aren't any reliable, inexpensive options for off roading yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant:  I&#8217;ve busted a derailleur before and can attest that they can be damage relatively easily by  catching it on a rock or falling the right way.</p>
<p>But as Fritz and James mentioned and I discussed some in the post, the rear derailleur is just more practical for the beginner rider.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen more and more discussion and prototypes of the internal gear system and know it&#8217;s being used on some commuter bikes already to save the mess of chains and grease, however as far as I know, there currently aren&#8217;t any reliable, inexpensive options for off roading yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-82782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-82782</guid>
		<description>I agree, gears for the beginner inspire confidence as you build strength, aerobic conditioning, and skills.  Yes, the rear derailleur has the potential to get bent if banged on a rock or log... but very repairable.

Single speeds, well built and with proper chainline and tension, are bullet-proof.  However, I've ridden with a number of single speeders whose chainline or tension was less than ideal, leading to a lot of frustrating trailside repairs.  Although, one can make the same argument about a mis-adjusted geared bike as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, gears for the beginner inspire confidence as you build strength, aerobic conditioning, and skills.  Yes, the rear derailleur has the potential to get bent if banged on a rock or log&#8230; but very repairable.</p>
<p>Single speeds, well built and with proper chainline and tension, are bullet-proof.  However, I&#8217;ve ridden with a number of single speeders whose chainline or tension was less than ideal, leading to a lot of frustrating trailside repairs.  Although, one can make the same argument about a mis-adjusted geared bike as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-82581</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-82581</guid>
		<description>What are you guys doing to bikes that you are so afraid of rear derailleurs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you guys doing to bikes that you are so afraid of rear derailleurs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-82531</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-82531</guid>
		<description>I agree that geared is more practical, but there is nothing bombproof about any rear dérailleurs on the market. Maybe an off-road specific internally geared hub will be the solution in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that geared is more practical, but there is nothing bombproof about any rear dérailleurs on the market. Maybe an off-road specific internally geared hub will be the solution in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/comment-page-1/#comment-82452</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/02/14/bombproof-project-geared-vs-singlespeed/#comment-82452</guid>
		<description>SS is fun, but I agree that geared is more practical and more popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SS is fun, but I agree that geared is more practical and more popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

