<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cannondale wants all to move to bigger bottom bracket</title>
	<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/09/05/cannondale-wants-all-to-move-to-bigger-bottom-bracket/</link>
	<description>Mountain Bike Reviews, News, Deals and How Tos</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/09/05/cannondale-wants-all-to-move-to-bigger-bottom-bracket/#comment-99961</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/09/05/cannondale-wants-all-to-move-to-bigger-bottom-bracket/#comment-99961</guid>
		<description>The 30mm refers to the axle diameter? Not the bb shell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 30mm refers to the axle diameter? Not the bb shell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/09/05/cannondale-wants-all-to-move-to-bigger-bottom-bracket/#comment-45127</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/09/05/cannondale-wants-all-to-move-to-bigger-bottom-bracket/#comment-45127</guid>
		<description>24mm/30mm wide? I don't think so. Those are both about an inch. But if so we'd have more Q-factor options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24mm/30mm wide? I don&#8217;t think so. Those are both about an inch. But if so we&#8217;d have more Q-factor options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
