<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oklahoma Mountain Biking Club Sued by Injured Rider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/</link>
	<description>Mountain Bike Reviews, News, Deals and How Tos</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Royce Allen</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/comment-page-1/#comment-43668</link>
		<dc:creator>Royce Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/#comment-43668</guid>
		<description>I guess he could, but let's talk safety.  When you are riding on a trail that is a sponsored trail and you come upon a bridge, do you assume it is ok to cross or do you walk it first.  If you are on a trail that is not maintained, you would assume that all should be inspected before crossing.  This trail is on city property specifically designed for walkers and riders.

If you were riding on the street and a car hit you from behind and your back was broken.  Would you sue?  Sure you would!  You expect safety on the streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess he could, but let&#8217;s talk safety.  When you are riding on a trail that is a sponsored trail and you come upon a bridge, do you assume it is ok to cross or do you walk it first.  If you are on a trail that is not maintained, you would assume that all should be inspected before crossing.  This trail is on city property specifically designed for walkers and riders.</p>
<p>If you were riding on the street and a car hit you from behind and your back was broken.  Would you sue?  Sure you would!  You expect safety on the streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euan</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/comment-page-1/#comment-43663</link>
		<dc:creator>euan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/#comment-43663</guid>
		<description>it's disgusting that he is suing. thats all anyone ever does. can he not just accept responsability for his accident. you ride the trails, you take the risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s disgusting that he is suing. thats all anyone ever does. can he not just accept responsability for his accident. you ride the trails, you take the risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royce Allen</title>
		<link>http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/comment-page-1/#comment-30395</link>
		<dc:creator>Royce Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluecollarmtb.com/2006/01/30/oklahoma-mountain-biking-club-sued-by-injured-rider/#comment-30395</guid>
		<description>I found your article about the Oklahoma Mountain Biking club Sued by Injured Rider.  I am somewhat confused about the title on the link "Read the whole disgusting article".  Did this mean you were disgusted that the biker was suing over his severe injuries or because the bridge had not been maintained?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your article about the Oklahoma Mountain Biking club Sued by Injured Rider.  I am somewhat confused about the title on the link &#8220;Read the whole disgusting article&#8221;.  Did this mean you were disgusted that the biker was suing over his severe injuries or because the bridge had not been maintained?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

