Quantcast

Law, if passed, prohibits baby carrying commutes

December 12th, 2005 by Tim Grahl

Found this bill via Cycleicious:

Introduced by Sen. Jim Honeyford on December 7, 2005, to prohibit a person from operating a bicycle attached to an occupied baby carrier on a street or other roadway, unless the bicycle is operated within a city or town that prohibits the operation of bicycles on the sidewalk adjacent to the street or other roadway.

Fritz says is stupid. I’m not sure. Despite what you may say, cycling on the road can be pretty dangerous. Between poorly built roadway systems and unattentive drivers, the risks are definitely there.

The last thing me, or anyone else, should be doing is strapping a baby to the bike and making things worse.


5 Responses to “Law, if passed, prohibits baby carrying commutes”

  1. 1 Guitar Ted 

    I wonder, does this include trailers? I can totally see why you would ban the carriers that attach to a rack on a bike. If you go down, your kid’s gonna get slammed! Otherwise, I see no problem with a trailer. They are far safer, provide a bigger overall mass for the drivers to see, and capable of being used for several other things.

  2. 2 Fritz 

    No, Tim, cycling on the road is not generally dangerous. A German study several years ago showed that kids in trailers fared better than children on the rack carriers, but even still the risk of an actual rear-end collision is very low.

    This bill is so ridiculous on so many levels. I can imagine the bill-writer actually had to SLOW DOWN (God forbid) when he saw some mama on the road toting a baby. This is NOT a safety issue. It’s nothing but legislative road rage against cyclists.

    Did you see that the bill mandates operation of these baby-carrier bikes on the sidewalk?? Did you know the risk of getting hit is up to 17 times greater on the sidewalk than in the street? We’re talking an ORDER OF MAGNITUDE difference between the street and sidewalk here.

    Claire explains some of the problems with this bill here.

  3. 3 Mike 

    I think people look at things that aren’t common as being very dangerous. Just like people who think flying is more dangerous than driving a car when driving the same distance as a normal non stop flight (719 miles) is 65 times as risky as flying. You don’t see many people with kids on the back of their bikes, therefore it seems to be dangerous because not everyone does it.

  4. 4 Haywood 

    Laws are made when it is found out that people do stupid things.

    One example of a stupid thing is showing up for a training ride with your 2 year old adopted son from Kazakstan in the back of a buggy trailer.

    This action is even more stupid when you know the speeds of this training ride will reach 30mph plus.

    Even more stupid when you take out some of your fellow riders when you blow by them on a pace line and either forget or don’t care whether you have enough room to pass.

    But the most stupid ( and arrogant and selfish and thick headed ) thing to do is when you are told not to show up with the baby trailer by your fellow cyclist for safety reasons and you still do it anyway cause your name is John Wordin and you don’t listen to anyone.

  5. 5 gwadzilla 

    the city streets can be dangers
    heck
    a country road can be dangerous
    but honestly…
    the crosswalk with a stroller is as dangerous riding a bike in traffic
    it is foolish that legislation would go after the commuter rather than simply having the cops who are already on duty enforce the laws
    I have said it a thousand times… people need to take their driving habits out of autopilot
    people are not focusing on the task at hand
    they are rounding off the rules and cutting corners

    no one makes full stops
    no one is within a reasonable standard deviation of the speed limit
    most of all
    no one is in the least bit courteous of each other
    people are selfish f–ks
    sorry
    can not help myself
    as a father
    this hits close to home

    people need to slow down

Leave a Reply